Saturday, 15 April 2017

Tories try to defend plan to cut free bus passes

It didn't take long for Derbyshire Tories to respond to the Labour pledge to fight to keep free bus passes for pensioners and the disabled.

They are particularly upset at the petition organised by Glossopdale Labour Party which you can access here: https://www.change.org/p/hm-government-retain-free-bus-passes-and-winter-fuel-allowance-for-pensioners and to yesterday's BelperStuff post Tories plan to cut bus passes and brand this as Labour scaremongering.

The Derbyshire Conservative group has responded through their leader Barry Lewis and he says:

"It is the Government that is responsible for these allowances - not the County Council. And the Conservative Government has spelt out its intention in its 2015 Manifesto - it will protect pensioner benefits including the free bus pass, TV licences and Winter Fuel payments. You can't get clearer than that."

Now there are several reasons why we don't believe Barry Lewis; most notably that the leader of the Tories in the Local Government Association (LGA Tory Lord Gary Porter who has been elevated to a Baronetcy quite recently) is very close to current government thinking so when he says that free bus passes should be cut and the money "saved" spent on care for the elderly it will be safe to assume that this is being discussed in Westminster.

We can also look at the LGA saying that free bus passes are under threat as long ago as 2014 in a Sky news video from youtube:



The LGA spokesman in the video speaking about the threat to fee bus passes is Tory Councillor David Simmonds CBE.

Here is that link again for those who receive this blog by email without embedded video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_HpYEdELRM


So who is scaremongering now Barry Lewis?


I also note that Barry has complete faith in Tory manifesto promises:

" ............... the Conservative Government has spelt out its intention in its 2015 Manifesto - it will protect pensioner benefits including the free bus pass, TV licences and Winter Fuel payments. You can't get clearer than that."


Barry Lewis with the Tory minister who promised
 railway electrification then did not deliver it.

Oh what a trusting soul you are Barry. How have other Tory 2015 manifesto promises been honoured:


  1. Promise not to cut child tax credits - forgotten when child tax credits cut.
  2. Protect child benefit despite freeze - the reality is that the value of child benefit will have fallen 24% by 2021.
  3. Promised to electrify railways (in East Midlands by 2019) - reality - many schemes cut back and we have no idea if the electrification between Derby and Sheffield will ever be started.
  4. Tax free childcare by 2015 - still waiting.
  5. Three days off with pay for volunteering - reality - shelved as too expensive.
  6. Social care cap at £72,000 for elderly and younger disabled to be introduced in 2016 - shelved until 2020 but to be reviewed. look out for this one in the 2020 Tory manifesto.
  7. No increase to NI for self employed - Hammond tried to increase this tax but a Tory rebellion has forced a rethink.
  8. Have to include the big one from 2010, no increase to VAT - reality was that VAT was increased within months.
  9. Protect the environment, most green government ever - the reality is more fracking and licenses for open cast coal mines.
  10. Added 18/4/17 - David Cameron/Teresa May - No general election until 2020
If you need any more help Barry I suggest that you check this out: Daily Mirror article - 21 broken Tory promises

As Barry says, "......You can't get clearer than that."



Friday, 14 April 2017

Tories plan to cut bus passes ............ Labour pledge to fight to keep them

The Conservative Chair of the Local Government Association (LGA) has stated that the way to help fund council services is to end free bus passes for pensioners. The LGA Chair is Lord Gary Porter of Spalding and in an interview earlier this year he proposed that councils could save money if the right to travel free on buses was withdrawn from pensioners. He later claimed:

"............ It would still encourage people to use busses and allow companies to generate cash".

source: Huffington Post

Free bus passes for the over 60's were introduced in 2007 by the Labour Chancellor, Gordon Brown and benefited 11 million people. It was also a welcome boost for hard pressed bus companies with, by 2014,  £2.3 billion of central government subsidies being made available, administered by local authorities such as Derbyshire County Council. (2014/15, subsidies in the UK were £2.3 billion, made up of £826 million for London, £516 million for metropolitan areas outside London and £951 million for non-metropolitan areas such as Derbyshire).

Unfortunately, in line with the pushing back of the pension age the bus pass is gradually changing and by 2020 will be available for those reaching the pension age of 66. This change has saved the treasury over £200 million a year. The Tory plan to cut back even further would mean taking away from pensioners even more. Tories plan to cut back pensioner benefits whilst using that money to fund tax cuts to the wealthy .............. such as the £400 cut in tax per year for those earning between £45,000 and £100,000 which was a measure in the last Tory budget ............ and there are so many more examples.

If you want to bore into the facts about the bus pass scheme then this is a good place to start - the Greener Journeys group analysis of free bus passes. I urge you to click on this link to read this paper which highlights the fact that:

For every £1 spent we gain a benefit to our society and economy of £2.87.


"Half of the benefits accrue directly and immediately to concessionary travellers themselves, around 20% of the benefits to other bus passengers and other road users from transport network improvements, and the rest to the wider community from wider economic and social impacts and in particular from improvements in health and wellbeing".............. I am quoting directly from the Greener Journeys paper I linked to above.

Note that an appraisal of commercial benefits such as increased shopping on local high streets or visits to local attractions has not been included so the benefits could be much higher. I note that nationally, 54% of free bus pass journeys are made to go shopping and the money saved on bus tickets is available to be spent in those shops. The boost to the local economy is undeniable.

Without the wider commercial benefits this translates as a cost/benefit ratio of 2.87. Compare that with the cost/benefit ratio of the new railway scheme between London & Birmingham, HS2 which has dipped below 1.5 and does include wider commercial benefits ............. investment in bus passes for elderly and disabled  gives a much better return. We should ask why Tories propose ending concessionary bus passes but still actively promote HS2 when investment in bus services gives a return that is twice as good as the HS2.

Three Labour council candidates pledge to keep bus passes and winter fuel allowance
John Porter (Horsley), Clr John Owen (Belper), Jyoti Wilkinson (Alport & Derwent)
Carol Angharad (Duffield & Belper South), unfortunately not on the photo shares this pledge

Thanks to Cheryl Pidgeon for the photograph
The number of pensioners (65 and over) that would be affected by these Tory proposals living in the 4 Derbyshire electoral divisions being contested by these 4 Labour candidates are:

Alport & Derwent - 3,148 (27% of the 11,523 electorate)
Belper - 1,997 (17% of the 11,673 electorate)
Duffield & Belper South - 2,673 (23% of the 11,805 electorate)
Horsley - 2,801 ( 22% of the 12,552 electorate)

Plus the number of younger disabled folk who are eligible for a free bus pass. More research would be necessary to unearth that figure.

Source :Observatory Derbyshire

In conclusion

There is only one way to ensure that free bus passes are not cut by the Tories and that is to vote Labour in the elections on May 4th. This will send a strong message to Lord Porter of Spalding and Derbyshire Tories that free bus passes must not be cut. You will know that you have elected a Labour County Council that pledges to keep them.

Wednesday, 12 April 2017

Generous Derbyshire Tories promise that unpaid carers can have one afternoon off every 18 years

Ok so I realise that the title of this blogpost may seem like a cheap dig at Derbyshire Tories but I've just been reading their election manifesto and ............ well ...............read on;

I was rather taken aback with more than one of their claims but this one takes the biscuit:

  • Provide 5000 half day breaks to support Derbyshire Carers

It prompted me to do some research and I found that there are 92,763 individuals being looked after by unpaid carers. It took me about an hour to come up with that figure which can be gleaned from here: Observatory Derbyshire Area Profiles Website

Now if we assume that these generous Tories will be making a provision for 5,000 afternoons off per year then by the time of the next election in 2021 there would be 12,763 carers still waiting for their few hours respite.

If however the 5000 afternoons are to be spread over 4 years then the last carer to benefit will have waited over 18 years for their few hours of freedom.

Obviously I am calculating by the number of folk listed as receiving unpaid care which results in these ridiculous assumptions. "Derbyshire County Council provides services to almost 17,000 older, vulnerable and disabled people and supports 21,000 carers across Derbyshire", and here I am quoting the DCC website directly. Perhaps the Tories are targeting the 21,000 with the 5,000 afternoons off. More of this in another post.

Then there is the cost ............ no I'll not go into that ........... I did do some rough estimates but it's all nonsense. Of course carers need respite time off and we all have a part to play in this. If councils were properly funded and not subject to Tory government cuts we could have a meaningful crack at sorting out Care in the Community. Despite those Tory cuts Derbyshire Labour promise to give registered carers free travel throughout the county ............ now that can be delivered.

Of course, none of what the Derbyshire Tories propose adds up ............. it's just an ill thought out election gimmick and will fool nobody. If it took me just one hour to bottom out this nonsense why didn't the Tories check it out before making it an election pledge?



Just one reason why voting Labour ensures that adult care is treated seriously

Friday, 31 March 2017

A sad song for Remoaners

What a week. Just how significant will the letter be? Of course I am referring to the letter sent to the EU President to trigger Article 50 and the "inevitable" divorce of the UK from the EU. As the government has admitted, we have no way of knowing what will happen come 2019.

I have not seen any change in the facts so I have not changed my mind
Those who voted Remain in the EU referendum are branded the 48% whilst those of us who still argue that the vote to Leave was a mistake are branded Remoaners. I am told that I have to get over it and accept the will of the people ................... no, I'm not sorry to say that I will not. I respect their right to hold the views that they do but I too should be allowed to hold true to my own view. I am also regaled with exhortations that this is a time to pull together which reminds me of another famous letter, which, at the time was held aloft triumphantly with the words, "I have a little note" ............. and we know where that ended up. I mention this merely to point out that politicians can make mistakes, they do sometimes say things that turn out not to be true and some of their decisions, in hindsight, demonstrate a lack of understanding and wisdom.
Neville Chamberlain with his note from Herr Hitler
So, the process begins and Remoaners such as myself cast around for straws of comfort; still not quite able to believe that our country has fallen to nationalist ideology and xenophobia. OK, I will admit that there were many who voted Leave for what they considered to be higher ideals and I have many friends (yes I know that is hard to believe), many friends who I still respect who, none-the-less voted to leave the EU. They still believe in a better future despite so many indicators that show a belittling of our nation in the coming years following Brexit. To them I am a Remoaner who will one day be forced to realise that they were right and I was wrong.

A sad song for Remoaner


So, in a week of deep sadness I offer you this poignant Dylan song which sums up just how I am feeling. When listening to the song imagine that these are the words sung by a supporter of Brexit who is saddened that a loved one insists on continuing with the belief that it is better that the UK remains in the EU ...... a Remoaner.

For Ramona performed by Alan Price - link for those who receive the blogposts via email

I have chosen this wonderful version by Alan Price (ex the Animals) not least because you can follow Dylan's lyrics on the video. The twist is in the last line.


Friday, 17 March 2017

The pool of tears

Try as I might I cannot shake off the feeling that I am taking part in somebody else's dream. Each morning I wake up with the hope that the world is as I left it the night before but then reality takes hold as I remember that I was living in a nightmare even before I went to sleep, the surreal world of dreams now being more rational in comparison. I wake to a world where undeniable truths are replaced by the cockeyed logic of Brexit and Trump.

For instance, Hammond's spring budget where he spoke of building up a reserve to stave off the effects of Brexit once we finally leave the EU. It wasn't many months ago that the former Tory chancellor Osborne was warning us that the main problem facing the UK was the annual deficit and a burgeoning national debt. In one day of referendum all this has changed because choosing to leave the EU with a deal or even no deal offers a great future for this country. As Theresa May said, "no deal is better than a bad deal", then going on to say, "sentence first! then the verdict" ............. or was that latter quote uttered by The Queen of Hearts?

What utter nonsense all this is. Total confusion in government with the "Brexit" minister David Davies admitting that no analysis has been made of a Brexit without a deal. He then went on to say that such an analysis would be impossible because of what might happen in the meantime. I don't think I've ever heard a government minister say anything quite so stupid as that before* and it does ask the question,"how can Theresa May claim that no deal is better than a bad deal if she has no idea what a no deal scenario would look like? Have they not considered carrying out a risk assessment? The treasury and the Office for Budget Responsibility have both issued dire warnings of a no-deal exit but it seems that neither Davis nor May have been given copies of those reports.

Alice in Wonderland - George Dunlop Leslie
Brighton & Hove Museums & Art Galleries
For those who were lucky enough to be read bedtime stories the title of this post will need no explanation. Lewis Carroll (the alias of Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) wrote about the dream of a little girl who falls asleep on a riverbank, Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. At one point in the story Alice cries a flood of tears that end up being a pool in which she is swimming.  BelperStuff follows a long line of political commentators who have drawn parallels between Lewis Carroll's masterpiece and the doings of the great and famous but the similarities with the illogicality of the current political scene are striking. The author of this article: Hammond is not telling us what he should be - article in the Independent highlights the absurdity of the government's position. These people are all over the place, floundering in a pool of tears that is all of their own making. The U in UK is at risk as the Scots think about a further independance vote; the border between Northern Ireland and Eire is once again uncertain which threatens the hard won peace in that region (already the political complexion of Stormont has shifted to republicanism); we have no idea what will happen to British jobs or financial institutions and non-UK EU citizens in this country or British nationals living in the EU are considered to be bargaining chips. The two basic pillars of any society are the sustainability of it's economy and the rights and freedoms of it's people. We were assured at successive elections that the country was best off with a Tory government but just look at what we have ended up with!!!!!

But what if this is but a dream?

There is that one feint hope, that I might after all be dreaming all this.That in 2015 the country voted for a Miliband led government that did not hold an EU referendum, that carried out it's pledge to create a million jobs in sustainable, environmentally friendly energy and much more. Their manifesto wasn't perfect but I think that the Tory claim that the SNP would pull the strings of a coalition Labour government would have been so much better (if true) than a Tory party that has completely caved in to the deadly combination of a  eurosceptic far right wing in cahoots with the populism of UKIP. By voting Labour we would have avoided all that and no tears would have been shed ............. well not enough to create a pool anyway ........ at worst a puddle.

I have though to admit that this nightmare is a reality and I am afraid that our government will not wake up until it is too late. When they do finally pull themselves out of the pool of tears all that they will have achieved is to confirm that stupidity means stupidity.

The pool of tears. An original illustration by Tenniel


* I have not heard a government minister say anything as stupid as that ............. since ODS (Ian Duncan Smith) said, "I know what I know".
They can't walk away without a deal. An enormous number of things rely on certification of some sort or other. That the food is safe, that the planes are safe, that we can safely buy extra electricity from France. These are administered by EU bodies, some of them based here in the UK, we are good at standards. Already they are looking to relocate and a bidding war by European cities to host them has broken out. 

If the UK leaves without a deal, walks away without agreement then the food exports will cease, the planes, trains, ships and automobiles will stop moving. Exporters of all sorts will be unable to certify the electrical or mechanical safety of their goods. 

Drugs manufactured here will lose their certification and production will be switched elsewhere plunging thousands into unemployment. That is just one industry. The vehicle makers and exporters will be unable to sell their production and again production will be moved. 

The EU standards have been accepted by the rest of the world. To replace them the UK would have to establish de novo standards agencies in multiple and persuade every other country in the world, though the big trading blocs, EU, NAFTA, ASEAN, CIS, CER, AU will reduce the absolute numbers but complicate the negotiations. It could take 10 to 20 years to complete that process. If we started now it would signal to the EU that we intend to walk away and dam the talks before they start. The process cannot be hidden. 

When the Brexit ministers pretend to you that they can walk away and all will be fine they are either lying or pretending out of desperate bravado.

They can't walk away without a deal. An enormous number of things rely on certification of some sort or other. That the food is safe, that the planes are safe, that we can safely buy extra electricity from France. These are administered by EU bodies, some of them based here in the UK, we are good at standards. Already they are looking to relocate and a bidding war by European cities to host them has broken out. 

If the UK leaves without a deal, walks away without agreement then the food exports will cease, the planes, trains, ships and automobiles will stop moving. Exporters of all sorts will be unable to certify the electrical or mechanical safety of their goods. 

Drugs manufactured here will lose their certification and production will be switched elsewhere plunging thousands into unemployment. That is just one industry. The vehicle makers and exporters will be unable to sell their production and again production will be moved. 

The EU standards have been accepted by the rest of the world. To replace them the UK would have to establish de novo standards agencies in multiple and persuade every other country in the world, though the big trading blocs, EU, NAFTA, ASEAN, CIS, CER, AU will reduce the absolute numbers but complicate the negotiations. It could take 10 to 20 years to complete that process. If we started now it would signal to the EU that we intend to walk away and dam the talks before they start. The process cannot be hidden. 

When the Brexit ministers pretend to you that they can walk away and all will be fine they are either lying or pretending out of desperate bravado.

Tuesday, 7 March 2017

Pauline Latham not sentimental about refugees - updated 7/3/2017


Pauline famously stated at an EU Referendum hustings in St.Peter's Church in Belper that her heart told her to vote to leave the EU but her head said that we should stay in.

I wonder which part of her anatomy persuaded her to make these comments about refugees in parliament?


We are too sentimental about refugees - Pauline Latham quoted in the Independant

Updated on 7th March 2017 with yet another ill-advised Pauline Latham comment


The Independent doesn't seem to like Pauline does it.


For some sanity on this issue please refer to a previous BelperStuff blogpost:

Christians on the left at the Labour Party Conference 2016

Wednesday, 1 March 2017

Rough sleeping in Belper ---------- an increase in homelessness

Many of us have been hearing rumours that there are individuals sleeping rough in the town and last Saturday BelperStuff was given the opportunity to meet a group of four who are homeless. I met them at the Transition Belper cafe which is a fortnightly, Saturday morning event in No.28 on Market Head. I attended the cafe principally to meet up with the editorial team behind Belper Nailed online magazine but I ended up sitting at a table with a likeable quartet and hearing their stories, the daily struggle that is their life.

Their ages ranged from 32 to 40. One had found temporary accommodation in the Belper hostel for the homeless, one was sofa surfing but was worried that if found out the person who was providing shelter could lose their tenancy; the other two were sleeping out at night. One of them was even trying to hold down a job when they had no homebase; impossible odds. Four people, four different stories of ever increasing challenges which ultimately led them to not just homelessness and severe deprivation but to a point in their lives where there is no hope. No that's not quite correct as they did speak of how things could be better; the vague chance of progressing up the housing list so that you can once again be reunited with your child; or if you can get to grips with your underlying behavioural issues caused by drink, drugs or whatever then perhaps you might be offered a place at a hostel ......... or .......... or ....... or ......... you cling to straws because without hope you have nothing. The young women in the group summed it up when she said, "whichever way I turn I come up against a brick wall ................... but one day I will have enough points to get a home".

They spoke of others who were homeless in the town, a 55 year old man with a crutch who was sleeping rough and also a couple whose only option as they saw it was to live in a tent. The total number outside at night would seem to peak at 5 ........... yes that's right ......... 5 people sleeping rough in Belper. I had found it difficult to accept the rumours that there was just one person sleeping rough but 5 is an absurd number.

If we add on the precarious sofa-surfers (my informant knew of another 6 individuals in the same boat as him) and then add on the 12 staying at the hostel the total of homeless in the town is 24 individuals ............ and those are the ones we know about.

Vagrants No.3 - John Bulloch Souter (1890 - 1972)
Aberdeen Art Gallery


The person from Transition Belper who introduced me to the four at the cafe later took me to the hostel to talk with the staff there. I had noticed mention of the hostel as a point of referral to the Belper food bank (a previous BelperStuff post about the food bank). I had a long and very interesting discussion with the staff who run the hostel and they impressed me with the obvious warmth they felt for those in their care. Obviously they could not go into details about any one individual but I heard enough to gain an impression of a well run facility providing shelter and support in a warm and welcoming environment. The hostel is part of a chain run by an organisation named Riverside (for more details this is the link to their website) and on Monday I telephoned the manager of the hostel, who told me about Riverside's work and their involvement with the homeless. They run a group of hostels, in our area centred around Derby. We discussed the difficulties of providing care against an ever decreasing level of funding (once again - government cuts) so support services and expertise for alcohol and drug dependency have been cut at Belper. I can understand the frustration felt by these professionals as it is obvious that for them this is a vocation. Those in need of specialist help are now referred to Derby but if you are a troubled homeless person the only thing that you can cling onto is friendship with those in the same situation as yourself. By going to Derby you are cut off from this most important of support networks. It doesn't take much imagination to understand the importance of a social network when you are homeless.

The hostel manager put me onto the AVBC officer whose remit includes care for the homeless so I telephoned him as well. Once again I was impressed with the level of commitment and the obvious effort made to ensure the wellbeing of the homeless in the borough. The officer knew the individual cases of each of the homeless that I had met and he was most meticulous in questioning me to see if there was any instance of homelessness that had escaped his notice. He informed me that those that slept rough would be unlikely to reach old age; the combination of health problems associated with exposure, the difficulties of personal hygiene and an impoverished diet taking years of a lifespan. It was rare to find a rough sleeper over the age of 50. He also said that, and here I can quote directly," there are more reports of rough sleeping now in Belper than I have encountered in the last 10 years". Normally there would be none. I asked him why this should be and he said that the homeless in Belper all had a connection with the town and he echoed the view of the hostel staff that the situation had been made worse by government cuts. We spoke of this website: Homeless Link and I urge you to visit the site for the bigger picture.

I was going to move on to the statistics behind homelessness in the East Midlands and of course the national picture but I think that this post is best to just concentrate on the situation in Belper. I will return to that in a subsequent post.

I took photos, visited locations, wrote down names and personal details but it doesn't help to share such specifics. That's why, instead, I accompanied this post with a pertinent artwork. I don't know what the answer to all this is but I am reminded of a conversation I had many years ago with Dr Stephenson who used to practice in Green Lane. He told me that when dealing with any form of difficult to resolve deprivation you just had to keep trying. I have witnessed that same resolve in the professionals with whom I spoke this week. You just have to keep trying but the first step is the easy one ............ people must be aware that the problem exists. The steps that follow get progressively harder.

A next day correction

After writing this post I sat down in my comfortable armchair, ate my dinner in my warm kitchen, relaxed for a few hours with television and then a good book before going to bed. Glancing out of the bedroom window I could see that it was snowing. I lay awake thinking about what I had written.

Did I give the impression that homelessness was the result of drink and drug addiction? I am afraid that I did even though I know that is not accurate. The AVBC housing officer had said that there were many complex reasons why people ended up homeless; each person being a unique case. I am sorry that I may have oversimplified what is obviously a very difficult problem. If there are common threads running through individual circumstances it has to be that they have difficulty finding somewhere to live, consistently paying rent when they do find somewhere and then holding onto that home. By concentrating on the logistics of housing rather than why it is that some fall through the net it becomes a problem of resources. If viewed from that perspective the way forward becomes somewhat clearer.

In a time of housing shortage landlords will choose tenants who will pay the rent and pose fewer problems. It is not as simple as just building more homes and the problem of homelessness will go away but it would be a good place to start. Perhaps that should be part of the next post and I am also concerned that benefit sanctions may be a huge factor in this issue.